Le 26/10/2021 à 19:31, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit : > Sylvestre Ledru <sylves...@debian.org> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Le 12/10/2021 à 03:51, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit : > [snip] >>>> Le 06/10/2021 à 17:05, Simon McVittie a écrit : >>>>>> /usr/bin/ld: >>>>>> projects/compiler-rt/lib/scudo/standalone/CMakeFiles/clang_rt.scudo_standalone-dynamic-mipsel.dir/wrappers_c.cpp.o: >>>>>> in function `scudo::atomic_u64::Type >>>>>> scudo::atomic_load<scudo::atomic_u64>(scudo::atomic_u64 const volatile*, >>>>>> scudo::memory_order)': >>>>>> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/compiler-rt/lib/scudo/standalone/atomic_helpers.h:66: >>>>>> undefined reference to `__atomic_load_8' >>>>>> /usr/bin/ld: >>>>>> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/compiler-rt/lib/scudo/standalone/atomic_helpers.h:66: >>>>>> undefined reference to `__atomic_load_8' >>>> Yeah, I saw, it guess it is a -latomic missing again :) >>>> >>> I've subscribed to this bug, since I just noticed llvm-toolchain-13 was >>> available, and irony-mode users always want to use the latest Clang. >>> Most irony-mode users are on amd64, so I'm thinking about switching now >>> (for the greatest good), but I'm wondering this: Given that you know >>> what the cause is, do you think this bug will soon be resolved? >>> >> >> I think i fixed that one but not sure yet if there is other pending issue >> See: >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-13 >> (it looks good for now) >> > Thank you Sylvestre! Much appreciated :-) I think the following two RC > bugs may be new since our last correspondence: #996632 and #996448 Yeah, I saw. I will probably just disable these tests for these archs. > > By the way, am I correct in understand that the focus for bookwork will > be on llvm-toolchain-13 (or possibly 14)?
I guess you mean Bookworm. if this is the case, no, it will probably much more than that. Debian releases every 2 years, LLVM/Clang every 6 months. So, probably 16 or 17. Cheers Sylvestre