Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal In order to keep the source package namespace more contained, I renamed the latest source packages from the fenics suite, to carry a fenics prefix:
basix (0.0.1~git20210122.4f10ef2-2) -> fenics-basix (0.3.0-10) ffcx (2019.2.0~git20210122.22ca4c0-2) -> fenics-ffcx (1:0.3.0-3) dolfinx (2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5) -> fenics-dolfinx (1:0.3.0-12) The old versions of the binary packages seem to be still available in the unstable (and experimental) archive, I think they should be removed: libbasix-dev 0.0.1~git20210122.4f10ef2-2 0.0.1~git20210409.b980196-2 libbasix0-dbgsym 0.0.1~git20210122.4f10ef2-2 0.0.1~git20210409.b980196-2 libbasix0 0.0.1~git20210122.4f10ef2-2 0.0.1~git20210409.b980196-2 python3-basix 0.0.1~git20210122.4f10ef2-2 0.0.1~git20210409.b980196-2 basix-doc 0.0.1~git20210122.4f10ef2-2 0.0.1~git20210409.b980196-2 python-ffcx-doc 2019.2.0~git20210122.22ca4c0-2 2019.2.0~git20210411.2b30c8d-1 python3-ffcx 2019.2.0~git20210122.22ca4c0-2 2019.2.0~git20210411.2b30c8d-1 libdolfinx-complex-dev 2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5 2019.2.0~git20210410.b421249-2 libdolfinx-complex2019.2-dbgsym 2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5 2019.2.0~git20210410.b421249-2 libdolfinx-complex2019.2 2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5 2019.2.0~git20210410.b421249-2 libdolfinx-real-dev 2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5 2019.2.0~git20210410.b421249-2 libdolfinx-real2019.2-dbgsym 2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5 2019.2.0~git20210410.b421249-2 libdolfinx-real2019.2 2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5 2019.2.0~git20210410.b421249-2 python3-dolfinx-complex 2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5 2019.2.0~git20210410.b421249-2 python3-dolfinx-real 2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5 2019.2.0~git20210410.b421249-2 python3-dolfinx 2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5 2019.2.0~git20210410.b421249-2 dolfinx-doc 2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5 2019.2.0~git20210410.b421249-2 libdolfinx-dev 2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5 2019.2.0~git20210410.b421249-2 Please don't remove the new 0.3.0 binary packages from the renamed fenics-* source packages! I have not renamed the older dolfin/ffc (not dolfinx/ffcx) packages, since they are deprecated upstream, replaced by dolfinx. For that reason I have also not (yet) renamed the ufl source package, since it is common for both ffc and ffcx. Perhaps ufl should get renamed also, for consistency. Binary packages have the same name, only the source package names have been changed. Drew
