On 1 December 2021 11:01:12 pm IST, Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> wrote: >But this is set[3]. If not Salsa-CI should fail.
You are testing it on a different version than in testing that's why it passes. If you want to validate, trigger CI on the upload commit for 0.12.1-4 >Moreover, the issue >is not connected at all to any r-bioc-* package since those packages >do not trigger any warning (which is actually issued by libgclib (may >be an upload of this package has triggered any failure - but it remains >unclear why). Actually, it started issuing a warning with regards to some white space/tab problem. Something else changed and it is already failing in testing. But yes, it has little to do with any bioconductor package here. On 1 December 2021 11:04:13 pm IST, Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> wrote: >But may be if you can work around this with some hinting that is the >easier solution here Yep. That'd be awesome. But we should make a list of all such packages and ping for Graham/Sebastian to propagate the hints accordingly. Probably that's what Graham wanted to say in the first place. Regards, Nilesh
