Package: pan-diffraction Severity: normal Version: 0.3 The pan-diffraction meta package "Suggests: nebula" despite pan-diffraction seems about something with scientific imaging while Debian's nebula package is a software defined network, see https://www.defined.net/nebula.
I suspect a different "nebula" was meant. I just have no idea which one: * OpenNebula seems to be about VMs and containerisation, see https://opennebula.io/. * The EPEL (RPM) package named "nebula" is an "Intrusion signature generator" (homepage dead, the domain is up for sale), i.e. also more sysadmin stuff than scientific imaging. Also found no package with "nebula" in the package name in the WNPP list. (I checked it by calling "wnpp-check nebula".) So maybe it's just the best to just remove that "Suggests" completely. (Or figure out which package was really meant.) P.S.: Noticed this by chance while having had a look at Debian's nebula package. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (110, 'experimental'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'buildd-experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.15.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads) Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
