Am Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 09:44:46AM +0100 schrieb Sven Mueller:
> Just out of curiosity: Wouldn't the right thing be to actively list those
> architectures known _not_ to work as !i386 (etc.)?
May be that would have been the better fix.
> I.e. have the binary
> packages that are defined in the debian/control file be "Architecture: any,
> !i386" (plus other known-to-be-broken architectures)?
> I wish there was a clean way to say: "any, except 32bit architectures", but
> I'm not aware of any such option.
The only way I know is
Architecture: amd64 arm64 mips64el ppc64el s390x alpha ppc64 riscv64 ia64
kfreebsd-amd64
which always includes the risk to forget some 64bit architecture.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
