On 12/13/21 4:30 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > On 13 December 2021 at 09:08, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote: > | Hi there, Dirk! > | > | I see that, libgslblasc0 is upgradable to version 2.7.1+dfsg-3 here, but > | the upgrade available version of libgsl25 (2.6+dfsg-2 -> 2.7+dfsg-2) > | requires libgslbalsc0 2.7.1+dfsg-2, which is unavailable. > | > | Digging around here, I noticed that the only package that still depends > | on libgsl25 after a supposed upgrade is sagemath. Is there a way to let > | them know this and try tu upgrade their dependency to libgsl27? Or is it > | better to bugreport them? > > That is is a bit of grey zone to me too. Sometimes the ftpmasters help nudge > this, or even do a 'binary build' (unchanged package rebuilt under new > dependencies). > I am CCing Sebastian who has been very helpful for the GSL update / informal > transition. He may be able to suggest a next step. > > Otherwise you could start with a simple email to the maintainer. > > Cheers, Dirk
sagemath maintainer here. The sagemath 9.2 package is broken at the moment and does not build and I wouldn't expect it to work very well either. I am working on a big update but that may still need some days until it's finished. In the meantime I wouldn't mind if sagemath 9.2 breaks further. Best, Tobias
