On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:57:38 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:33:27 +0200 Gregory Colpart wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:42:36AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > > Could you confirm me that my package will be DFSG-compliant ? > > > > > > > > Not entirely, but it looks like it probably will be. > > > > > > I don't agree. > > > The license under analysis is fully quoted below (for future > > > reference). I do *not* think that a work released solely under > > > this license can be considered to comply with the DFSG. > > > > To sum up, I hope persuading upstream to do one of following > > actions: > > > > - give permission to Debian project to package his softwares > > (like Apache Fundation for apache-1.3 woody packages [1]), > > That way it should go in main, though. > At least, that's my opinion.
Oooops! :p
What I actually intended to write was:
"That way it should *not* go in main, though."
Sorry for having incorrectly stated the opposite of what I meant... :-(
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpfG8fqebaD5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
