Source: nfs-ganesha
Version: 3.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/FSAL/FSAL_RGW && /usr/bin/cc 
> -DHAS_DOFF -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Dfsalrgw_EXPORTS -I/usr/include/uuid 
> -I/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/include 
> -I/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/include -I/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/include/os/linux 
> -I/include -I/usr/include/ntirpc -I/usr -g -O2 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE 
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -fPIC -MD -MT 
> FSAL/FSAL_RGW/CMakeFiles/fsalrgw.dir/up.c.o -MF 
> CMakeFiles/fsalrgw.dir/up.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/fsalrgw.dir/up.c.o -c 
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/FSAL/FSAL_RGW/up.c
> In file included from /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/FSAL/FSAL_RGW/up.c:40:
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/FSAL/FSAL_RGW/internal.h:50:2: error: #error 
> rados/rgw_file.h version unsupported (require >= 1.1.1)
>    50 | #error rados/rgw_file.h version unsupported (require >= 1.1.1)
>       |  ^~~~~
> [ 83%] Linking C shared module libganesha_rados_recov.so
> cd /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/SAL && /usr/bin/cmake -E 
> cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/ganesha_rados_recov.dir/link.txt --verbose=1
> make[4]: *** [FSAL/FSAL_RGW/CMakeFiles/fsalrgw.dir/build.make:79: 
> FSAL/FSAL_RGW/CMakeFiles/fsalrgw.dir/up.c.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/12/28/nfs-ganesha_3.4-2_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

Reply via email to