Hi, I forgot: If I understand the [Policy] correctly, this should be a DELAYED/0, right?
[Policy] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 23:43 +0100, Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sofia-sip": > > * Package name : sofia-sip > Version : 1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2 > Upstream Author : Pekka Pessi, Martti Mela, Kai Vehmanen > * URL : http://sofia-sip.sourceforge.net/ > * License : LGPL-2.1 > * Vcs : > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/ron/sofia-sip.git;a=summary > Section : net > > It builds those binary packages: > > sofia-sip-bin - Sofia-SIP library utilities > libsofia-sip-ua0 - Sofia-SIP library runtime > libsofia-sip-ua-dev - Sofia-SIP library development files > libsofia-sip-ua-glib3 - Sofia-SIP library glib/gobject interfaces > runtime > libsofia-sip-ua-glib-dev - Sofia-SIP library glib/gobject interface > development files > sofia-sip-doc - Sofia-SIP library documentation > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/sofia-sip/ > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this > command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sofia-sip/sofia-sip_1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2.dsc > > I have uploaded the package on salsa under > https://salsa.debian.org/devrtz/sofia-sip/-/tree/minimal-nmu > Judging by debdiff (as mentioned in #965829) there is basically only > some > changes in the -doc package which I believe are due to a newer > doxygen being used. > > I've also tested with one rdep (gnome-calls of which I'm the > maintainer) that > it still builds and runs fine. > > Changes since the last upload: > > sofia-sip (1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium > . > * Non-maintainer upload. > * Bump dh-compat to 13 (Closes: #965829) > > Regards,
