Since I could easily reproduce it, I ran git bisect.
7a9c36722511ce4df88b76cceceb241d6c6a151e is the first bad commit
commit 7a9c36722511ce4df88b76cceceb241d6c6a151e
Author: Brian Norris <briannor...@chromium.org>
Date: Fri Feb 28 15:50:47 2020 -0800
DBus: Add "sae" to interface key_mgmt capabilities
This will be present when the driver supports SAE and it's included in
the wpa_supplicant build.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannor...@chromium.org>
Reverting that commit on top of 2.10 I was again able to successfully
establish a connection.
The debian build uses CONFIG_SAE=y.Is it possible that wpasupplicant reports that the driver (iwlwifi) supports SAE but my hardware does not actually support SAE?
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000054783/wireless.html My network controller is an "Intel Corporation Centrino Advanced-N 6205"
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
