Hi Paul and Fukui,

On 22.03.2022 02:22, paul cannon wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 01:42:03PM +0000, Fukui Daichi wrote:
I've prepared an NMU [0] for uftrace (0.9.4-0.2) and would like to upload it to DELAYED/7 though the maintainer lists himself in the low threshold nmu list.

This patch is a new upstream release (0.11-0.1) and adjusts the existing patch accordingly. Having said that, it looks like Gurkan had already uploaded an experimental one [1].

Is this patch still helpful?

This looks like good work! But we've gotten ourselves into a bit of a
problem with respect to the package; Gürkan didn't realize I already had
packaging tracked on Github, and started a Git structure from scratch,
so it redoes history. I'm going to try to figure out how to stop a
package from experimental from being promoted to unstable and roll a
0.11-2 package.

Your changes might be helpful ones; I'll be able to tell more easily
once I have history straightened out more!

Paul, I'm so sorry, the salsa repo is really just this (so whatever is needed to get history back, I'm find
having it removed, started from scratch as it's only really this):

gbp import-dscs --debsnap uftrace
git push origin master upstream;git push --tags;git push -u origin --all

And I'm really bad with git/gbp/salsa, so I hope you can do that part, until I figure out how it's
supposed to be used.

Fukui, sorry I didn't see you wanted to do an NMU.

Thanks for your contributions,

Paul Cannon

Reply via email to