On Tuesday 02 May 2006 14:05, Kel Modderman wrote: > Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:34:31PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote: > >>> We could surely keep the conffile in place, but would this really fix > >>> the issue? > >> > >> If you were invoking wpa_supplicant by an own script, pre-up or > >> manually, and you expected wpa_supplicant.conf to exist yeah, I reckon > >> it would. > > > > Ok, good point. Perhaps we should leave the wpa_supplicant.conf in > > place, so that custom scripts will stind find it. However I think this > > is a quite seldom cornercase, and I highly doubt this would satisfy the > > submitter.
Of course this would satisfy the submitter. Why do you (Reinhard) think I suggested this solution? > Well, lets wait and see if this would indeed satisfy Felix' bug report, > from Felix himself. Thanks Kel! And just in case Reinhard did not understand: If you leave /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf in place on upgrades I regard the issue I reported in Bug#365613 as fixed! Kind regards, Felix -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
