On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:28:11AM +0100, наб wrote:
> -static int write_to_child(struct ul_pty *pty, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
> +static int schedule_child_write(struct ul_pty *pty, char *buf, size_t bufsz,
> int final)
> {
> - return write_all(pty->master, buf, bufsz);
> + struct ul_pty_child_buffer *stash = calloc(1, sizeof(*stash));
It means that for each activity on the file descriptor it will
allocate a new buffer (in BUFSIZ). It seems pretty expensive.
Cannot we reuse the buffers?
Maybe use include/list.h, define two lists, one for not-yet-written
buffers and another for ready-to-use buffers and move from one list to
another in schedule_child_write() and flush_child_buffers().
> + if (!stash)
> + return -1;
> +
> + memcpy(stash->buf, buf, bufsz);
> + stash->size = bufsz;
> + stash->final_input = final ? 1 : 0;
> +
> + if (pty->child_buffer_head)
> + pty->child_buffer_tail = pty->child_buffer_tail->next = stash;
> + else
> + pty->child_buffer_head = pty->child_buffer_tail = stash;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -311,16 +329,13 @@ static int write_to_child(struct ul_pty
> * maintains master+slave tty stuff within the session. Use pipe to write to
> * pty and assume non-interactive (tee-like) behavior is NOT well supported.
> */
> -void ul_pty_write_eof_to_child(struct ul_pty *pty)
> +static void drain(struct ul_pty *pty)
drain_child_buffers() :-)
Anyway, it looks good.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <[email protected]>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
