Package: supertuxkart Version: 1.3+dfsg1-3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer,
the SuperTuxKart package runs with substantially worse performance than the standalone binaries from supertuxkart.net Depending on the situation, my framerate increases by 40-80 FPS when switching to the standalone binaries. According to a dev, they don't do anything special with their builds. They only have compiler optimization enabled. ("g++ -Ofast") To me it feels like compiler optimization might just be off for the Debian package. As far as I am aware, both releases are built from the same source version and both use the same configuration (graphics settings, etc.) at runtime. Greetings Julian Groß -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.17.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages supertuxkart depends on: ii libbluetooth3 5.64-2 ii libc6 2.33-7 ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.83.0-1 ii libfreetype6 2.11.1+dfsg-2 ii libgcc-s1 12-20220428-1 ii libharfbuzz0b 2.7.4-1+b1 ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:2.1.2-1 ii libmbedcrypto7 2.28.0-2 ii libmcpp0 2.7.2-5 ii libopenal1 1:1.19.1-2 ii libpng16-16 1.6.37-5 ii libsdl2-2.0-0 2.0.22+dfsg-3 ii libsqlite3-0 3.38.5-1 ii libsquish0 1.15-1+b11 ii libstdc++6 12-20220428-1 ii libvorbisfile3 1.3.7-1 ii supertuxkart-data 1.3+dfsg1-3 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-4 supertuxkart recommends no packages. supertuxkart suggests no packages. -- no debconf information