On 2022-05-13 at 22:52:29, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2022 15:02:38 -0700 "Kevin J. McCarthy" <ke...@8t8.us> wrote:
> > Thanks for the bug report.  Yes, it most definitely is.  I'll take a
> > look to see what I can find.  Perhaps I've missed setting up some
> > callback information that gsasl needs.
> >
> > Would you be able to test a patch if/when I create one?  If so, please
> > make sure you are subscribed to this ticket and I'll work on something
> > this weekend.
> 
> Brian and Gábor, I did indeed miss a callback value needed by GSSAPI:
> hostname.  The Mutt IMAP/GSSAPI auth code is using the server hostname
> for this field, contradicting the gsasl documentation which says to
> supply the "local host name".  I'm trying the server hostname below.

Oh, yeah, that would do it.  Kerberos definitely wants to have the
hostname.

> If possible could you try either the git branch
> 'kevin/gsasl-gssapi-fixes' on GitLab
> <https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/commits/kevin/gsasl-gssapi-fixes> or
> alternatively try recompiling the source Debian package with the below
> patch applied?

I built the Debian package with the patch applied below.  It didn't
quite apply cleanly with patch -p1, but I copied and pasted the change.
It does appear to work, and I'm using the patched version to send this.

Thanks so much for the fast turnaround time.
-- 
brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them)
Toronto, Ontario, CA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to