On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:26:15AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > We're in the process of add support for a second implemtentation of > luajit [1] that supposedly is properly supported on IBM architectures > (ppc64el and s390x). While I scheduled binNMU's for nageru, I noticed > it doesn't build on all architectures where luajit is available and > reading d/control suggests that the reason why your package has an > explicit architecture list is because of luajit. In general, it's > recommended to just use Architecture: any in such cases, as your > package will not build on architectecture where your build > dependencies aren't available.
Yes and no. It also needs: - USB - A little-endian CPU - Working VA-API - Working OpenGL (not GLES) and especially the little-endian CPU demand is hard to express using Architecture: any. :-) You also tend to get FTBFS bugs filed pretty blindly by porters, for a software package that doesn't really make sense on such architectures. E.g. there's absolutely no way anyone would run Nageru on s390x, ever. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/
