Source: softhsm2 Version: 2.6.1-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[6]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/lib/test' > FAIL: p11test > ================================================ > SoftHSM 2.6.1: src/lib/test/test-suite.log > ================================================ > > # TOTAL: 1 > # PASS: 0 > # SKIP: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 1 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > > .. contents:: :depth: 2 > > FAIL: p11test > ============= > > ....................FF....F.F...F..FF..................... > > > !!!FAILURES!!! > Test Results: > Run: 25 Failures: 3 Errors: 0 > > > 1) test: InfoTests::testGetInfo (F) line: 124 TestsNoPINInitBase.cpp > setUp() failed > - equality assertion failed > - Expected: 0 > - Actual : 48 > > > 2) test: InfoTests::testGetFunctionList (F) line: 124 TestsNoPINInitBase.cpp > setUp() failed > - equality assertion failed > - Expected: 0 > - Actual : 48 > > > 3) test: InfoTests::testWaitForSlotEvent (F) line: 124 TestsNoPINInitBase.cpp > setUp() failed > - equality assertion failed > - Expected: 0 > - Actual : 48 > > > ... > > > !!!FAILURES!!! > Test Results: > Run: 25 Failures: 2 Errors: 0 > > > 1) test: InfoTests::testGetInfo (F) line: 124 TestsNoPINInitBase.cpp > setUp() failed > - equality assertion failed > - Expected: 0 > - Actual : 48 > > > 2) test: InfoTests::testWaitForSlotEvent (F) line: 124 TestsNoPINInitBase.cpp > setUp() failed > - equality assertion failed > - Expected: 0 > - Actual : 48 > > > > > > !!!FAILURES!!! > Test Results: > Run: 25 Failures: 2 Errors: 0 > > > 1) test: InfoTests::testGetFunctionList (F) line: 124 TestsNoPINInitBase.cpp > setUp() failed > - equality assertion failed > - Expected: 0 > - Actual : 48 > > > 2) test: InfoTests::testWaitForSlotEvent (F) line: 124 TestsNoPINInitBase.cpp > setUp() failed > - equality assertion failed > - Expected: 0 > - Actual : 48 > > > .. > > > OK (25 tests) > > > FAIL p11test (exit status: 1) > > ============================================================================ > Testsuite summary for SoftHSM 2.6.1 > ============================================================================ > # TOTAL: 1 > # PASS: 0 > # SKIP: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 1 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > ============================================================================ > See src/lib/test/test-suite.log > ============================================================================ > make[6]: *** [Makefile:812: test-suite.log] Error 1 > make[6]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/lib/test' > make[5]: *** [Makefile:920: check-TESTS] Error 2 > make[5]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/lib/test' > make[4]: *** [Makefile:993: check-am] Error 2 > make[4]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/lib/test' > make[3]: *** [Makefile:642: check-recursive] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/lib' > make[2]: *** [Makefile:404: check-recursive] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src' > make[1]: *** [Makefile:566: check-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' > dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 > returned exit code 2 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/24/softhsm2_2.6.1-2.1_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220624;users=lu...@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220624&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
