On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 01:43:25PM +0000, Lance Lin wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Thank you for your input and guidance. I've only been in Debian for a year so > > I still have many things to learn. I assumed there would be issues with > library > name conflicts and wanted to get the group's opinion. > > >> Or if the goal is rather to experiment and expose BabaSSL to the many archs > >> we have in Debian, then keep it in unstable only by filing a bug to block > >> it from testing. > > > Or better: experimental, to avoid packages starting to (build-)depend on it. > > It sounds like it would be suitable for the community if I continue the > packaging > work but restrict the package to experimental? As a drop-in OpenSSL replacement or with different file names and SONAMEs?
-- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
