Hi Peter, Peter B wrote: > > The suffix "icns" is already in the blacklist since 2.115.2. With > > which version of Lintian did you generate that list? > > I use Testing, so it was 2.115.1 It is indeed fixed in 2.115.2
Yay! Thanks for the reply. :-) > Trying on duma, I got several hits on binary files (with 2.115.1 & 2.115.2) > > P: duma source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 1628 > 512 > [win32-msvc.net/detoursexample1/detoursexample1.suo:2] > P: duma source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 2810 > 512 > [win32-msvc.2005/example2/example2.suo:7] > P: duma source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 2938 > 512 > [win32-msvc.2005/example1/example1.suo:8] > P: duma source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 6371 > 512 > [win32-msvc.2005/dumadll/dumadll.aps:5] > P: duma source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 6371 > 512 > [win32-msvc.net/dumadll/dumadll.aps:5] Ok, all .suo and .aps files in the duma package seem to be binary. I though have never heard of these file formats. Added nevertheless: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/5b70ce07fdc10b81a99049b6a2be50cbe4ae7009 > P: duma source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 5025 > 512 > [docs-data/Data/SymbolTable.nd:6] > P: duma source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 814 > 512 > [kduma/docs-data/Data/SymbolTable.nd:18] Only some of the .nd files in duma seem to be binary, others seem to be text. So I'm not declaring these suffixes as (always) being binary files. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
