On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 10:01:02AM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:07:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Good idea. I'd rather call it libldap2.2 and omit the -dev package for > > > now to stop people from using it for their packages.
> > If the lib package name doesn't match the actual soname used by the library, > > then all possible names are equally bad, FWIW. > Upstream SONAME has changed to libldap2.2. grabbing the package from http://pkg-openldap.alioth.debian.org/openldap2.2/ (thanks, Stephen): $ dpkg -x libldap2.2_2.2.23-0.pre2_i386.deb /tmp/ldap-unpack && objdump -p /tmp/ldap-unpack/usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.16 | grep SONAME SONAME libldap-2.2.so.7 $ So no, libldap2.2 is *not* what the upstream SONAME was changed to. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
