Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 2022-07-15 14:03:24 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2022-07-13 22:52:52)
> > On 2021-09-29 10:38:07 +0200, jo...@mister-muffin.de wrote:
> > > > Do all reverse dependencies build fine with the new Imagemagick version?
> > > > If not, have bugs been filed?
> > > 
> > > I have rebuilt all 399 source packages that have at least one binary 
> > > produced
> > > by src:imagemagick in their build dependency installation closure. Of 
> > > those, 16
> > > packages FTBFS with the imagemagick version form experimental but succeed 
> > > with
> > > the version from unstable. Of those, only one package (src:wand) is in 
> > > the list
> > > from https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-imagemagick.html I 
> > > filed
> > > this failure as #995290 and will investigate the other 15 instances as 
> > > well.
> > > But since those source packages are not part of the transition, they 
> > > should
> > > probably not block this bug.
> > 
> > This transition completly dropped off my radar, sorry!
> > 
> > What's the current status of the preparations? Have the bugs been filed?
> 
> we had one build failure in src:wand which I fixed in imagemagick upload of
> 8:6.9.12.20+dfsg1-1.2 to experimental. See also #995290

Please go ahead

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Reply via email to