El 14/09/22 a las 13:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió: > On 13/09/2022 16:46, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > IIUC this is about fixing 2 non-security bugs, that were introduced > > prior to buster's initial release. > > > > I personally don't think this fits the LTS project scope. > > Maybe other LTS members will have a different opinion. > > We've had bugfix updates from time to time. They are rare, but not > forbidden. This should go in a buster suite rather than buster-security, but > since there's no such suite for LTS, having it in buster-security is the > lesser evil. Of course we shouldn't flood -security with bug fixes, if that > was necessary we should consider keeping $stable open and handled by the LTS > team (but that doesn't seem necessary at this point). > > In this case, since the update has been prepared and looks sensible, I'll go > ahead with the upload if nobody objects. >
Thanks, Emilio. Also consider https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961654#15 Haven't tested yet myself. But I suppose I should apply it in unstable. Cheers, -- S
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
