Hi Tomasz On 10/6/22 20:36, Tomasz Rybak wrote: > 1. It looks like you took package as it is currently in archive > (i.e. 3.0.1) and brough it up to new version. Is this correct?
yes, the NMU is as minimal intrusive as possible compared to the last upload to the archive, currently in sid. > While I don't mind other DDs working on package and uploading > new versions and even welcome that (that's why it's team-maintained), > please do it taking already-existing changes into consideration, > and following Team's policy. When contributing and taking part in other teams/peoples packages, I completely agree. For NMUs which are "QA-one-shorts", certainly one cannot take everything into account for every team there is in Debian. This would basically make NMUs impossible to do (or limit it to a very small amount of people). > 2. Have you fully built package, including binary documentation *.deb? yes. > If you succeeded, this might mean that older version had some > problems which were fixed in 3.1.2. I guess so. Regards, Daniel
