Hello Sebastian Ramacher, On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 07:38:14PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 = confirmed > > On 2022-10-18 21:24:03 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Hello release team, > > > > I'd like to transition gssdp/gupnp to 1.6 version as part of current > > GNOME release. > > Please go ahead
I'll hold off a few more days if that's not a problem. Both because I'll be a bit busy the next couple of days but also because there was a (newly added) test that failed on s390x in gupnp/experimental. With help from upstream the actual bug in gssdp/experimental should be fixed, new gssdp/experimental has built (except on ppc64el) and I've done a giveback of gupnp/experimental on s390x but it has still not built yet confirming if the problem is actually fixed and the test passes. Is there any chance you have a way to give some priority to gupnp/experimental on s390x? https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gupnp&suite=experimental I'll probably also look into doing some NMUs to experimental of rdeps before kicking off the actual transition. If this means you want to put me back on hold and give the slot to someone else, that's fine with me! I just want to make sure we get this transition done before freeze so gnome versions are all synced up. Regards, Andreas Henriksson PS. Thanks for being very responsive through this process. A few years ago waiting several months without hearing anything was common and kind of what I still was expecting. This feels alot more like coordinating in the real sense of the word.
