On zaterdag 29 oktober 2022 07:15:19 CEST Vincent Bernat wrote:
> On 2022-10-29 00:50, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> >> The card works just fine with a 5.19 kernel after installing these files
> >> in /usr/lib/firmware/ath11k/WCN6855/hw2.0/:
> >> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/WCN6855/hw2.0/1.1/WLA
> >> N.H SP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.16/amss.bin
> >> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/WCN6855/hw2.0/1.1/WLA
> >> N.
> >> HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.16/m3.bin
> >> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/WCN6855/hw2.0/board-2
> >> .b
> >> in
> >> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/WCN6855/hw2.0/regdb.b
> >> in
> >> 
> >> And then creating a symlink from /usr/lib/firmware/ath11k/WCN6855/hw2.1/
> >> to hw2.0/ .
> >> 
> >> (I do not understand the structure of the directories in
> >> WCN6855/hw2.0/1.1/, so I choose the newest files.)
> >> 
> >> Some other firmwares from
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.g
> >> it/tree/qca are needed for Bluetooth support and are missing as well:
> >> 
> >> qca/rampatch_usb_00130201.bin
> >> qca/nvm_usb_00130201_gf.bin
> > 
> > I found all the mentioned file names in the buildd log for 20220913-1, so
> > I guess the issue is fixed.
> > Can you verify that and update/close the bug accordingly?
> 
> They are not present.
> 
>   07:14 ❱ dpkg -L firmware-atheros | grep -E '(WCN6855|nvm_usb_00130201)'

Thanks for checking. It turned out my checks were 'incomplete'.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/log/?qt=grep&q=WCN6855
does show various results which come very close ...SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.7 vs
the referenced ...SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.16.
And one commit is for symlinks to hw2.1

qca/rampatch_usb_00130201.bin is also present in the upstream repo, but 
searching for nvm_usb_00130201_gf.bin did not yield any results.

So this looks like upstream does have most of the needed files, albeit a
slightly older version?
I don't know if anything should be done based on this, but figured I'd share
my findings.

HTH,
  Diederik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to