If you can come up with a better solution than a strict dependency, great. But the current situation, in which samba upgrades randomly render systems unusable is, in my opinion, much much much worse than an overly strict dependency. Fundamentally the problem is that you're promising future compatibility but not providing that. One way or another samba-libs either needs to not suggest that linked binaries will work with future versions, or make sure that they do. -- Michael Stone (From phone, please excuse typos)
- Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation Michael Stone
- Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation Michael Tokarev
- Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violat... Michael Stone
- Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy vi... Michael Tokarev
- Bug#1013259: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#1013... Michael Tokarev
- Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible polic... Michael Tokarev
- Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible ... Ralph Boehme
- Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possi... Michael Tokarev
- Bug#1013259: samba-libs: P... Andreas Schneider
- Bug#1013259: samba-libs: P... Andreas Schneider
- Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible polic... Michael Stone
- Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible ... Michael Tokarev