Control: tags -1 + upstream On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 03:37:36PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: python-ssdeep > Version: 3.1+dfsg-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64.
At the time when I introduced python-ssdeep to Debian, fuzzy hashing was not a thing. tlsh didn't exist. Now it is there and tlsh seems technically supperior albeit incompatible. So unless there is some compatibility reason for keeping ssdeep, I think it should be RoQAed. And no, updating it to 3.4 does not fix the ftbfs. Would someone handle dnstwist, which is the only remaining dependency? Helmut
