Control: block -1 by 1022248 1018945 On 2022-11-06 09:08:57 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi RMs, > > There's a long awaited transition of Protobuf. It clashes with the > ruby3.1-default transition, but as I know its rebuilds are just > starting[1]. > On the other hand I'm done with the rebuilds and patched all issues, > this transition may start immediately at your decision. The only > downside is that the Sid version of cura-engine is FTBFS and to fix > it, the libarcus transition (only affecting this package) will need to > be done. > > Failing packages and fixes in detail. > Level 2: > android-platform-frameworks-base has my patch already applied [2] for > experimental (not Sid!). > libarcus builds in Sid, but not the version in experimental for which > I provided a fix [3]. > target-factory changed library symbols [4], maintainer will need to update > that. > > Level 3: > cura-engine fails with the Sid version [5], with the libarcus > transition done it compiles fine. > grpc-java for which I provided the fix [6], the maintainer noted he > will be ready to update the package. > llvm-toolchain-13 for which I provided the fix [7], other problems > seem to be fixed with the upload just happened. > llvm-toolchain-14 for which I also provided the fix [8], its other > problem [9] might be wrongly closed by cross referenced > llvm-toolchain-15 package - but Sylvestre Ledru seems to be aware of > issues anyway.
Let's wait until icu and libbpf are done. Cheers > > Thanks for considering, > Laszlo/GCS > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1023495#5 > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/1012572 > [3] https://bugs.debian.org/1023497 > [4] https://bugs.debian.org/1023496 > [5] https://bugs.debian.org/1023498 > [6] https://bugs.debian.org/1023500 > [7] https://bugs.debian.org/1023532 > [8] https://bugs.debian.org/1023532 > [9] https://bugs.debian.org/1023444 > -- Sebastian Ramacher