Source: btrbk Version: 0.32.5-1 Severity: wishlist
Hey Axel. Actually I'm not even sure myself whether that's worth it ;-) ... but what would you think about splitting off ssh_filter_btrbk in a separate package? I mean it's typically never used on the same host where btrbk runs, unless perhaps in some where odd scenarios. In principle, btrbk is quite lightweight, so one could argue it's not worth it, and people can simply just install the full btrbk packge on those nodes where they only need ssh_filter_btrbk and just not set up a btrbk.conf there. OTOH, the package does install two systemd units... and while they don't execute (with the PRs I've made just before upstream), they they're still active and show up in all systemctl listings, logs, etc. ... thereby cluttering these up a bit. Of course, the user could just disable them though. So, no super strong wish from my side... unless you don't just like the idea right away, just close that bug as wontfix. Thanks, Chris.