Hi Sebastian, Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Control: block -1 by 1024563 > > Control: block -1 by 1024565 > > Control: block -1 by 1024567 > > > > Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies. > > I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP bugs as > > blocker. > > As this is happening every r-bioc transition, could this be handled > before starting the transition the next time?
This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those packages from the transition. I actually injected two packages from higher levels manually to be able to build one of the new packages. So we really need to upload the start of the transition and I do not see any sense in not documenting what we are doing without the transition tracker. However, to make us understand your suggestion better: Is there any drawback on your side if the transition of a closed set of packages if the transition is delayed by new processing? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de