No current changes are needed to QT WebEngine as it currently exists in Debian. It works just fine as long as the dictionaries are in the canonical location (or that canonical location is a symlink to the actual location).
I have written some descriptions of my testing of this in earlier posts to this bug report, but if there are any questions I would be happy to provide more documentation about how I did my testing and how anyone can reproduce it and verify that the existing QT WebEngine already has all the .bdic plumbing built into it. On Monday, November 21, 2022 11:29:28 AM MST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 15:13, Soren Stoutner <so...@stoutner.com> wrote: > [snip] > > > This would also require the the Debain Qt/KDE Maintainers add a symlink > > from / usr/share/qt5/qtwebengine_dictionaries and /usr/share/qt6/ > > qtwebengine_dictionaries to /usr/share/hunspell-bdic. They can do this in > > whatever package makes the most sense to them, but possibly in > > libqt5webengine-data and libqt6webengine6-data. > > The problem is not a symlink, but building and testing qt[5 6]webkit > with this change. Maybe building is not an issue as we could just > remove the bdic files and add the symlink... but someone who really > understands what's going on under the hood should do a very careful > test to see things are working. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
