Package: profanity Version: 0.13.1-1~bpo11+1 Followup-For: Bug #1017049 X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug.profan...@sideload.33mail.com
After upgrading, bugs 1 & 3 from the OP still exist in version 0.13.1-1~bpo11+1. Bug 2 seems to be resolved. That is, “[OMEMO]” indeed appears in the title bar when the channel is encrypted and “[unencrypted]” appears in red otherwise. That’s good. Bug 1: One could suggest that the title bar indicator is sufficient, but I’d say it’s still too subtle to serve as acknowdgement to a command. It’s important that the “[OMEMO]” continuously show how the conversation is secured, but also when a user enters a command it’s a better UX if an ack is received like other non-msg info (leading with a bang “!”). Bug 3: The /help omemo page still does not make it clear that for group chats the command must be entered from within the window and the “[<contact>]” must be omitted. -- System Information: Debian Release: 11.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (990, 'stable-updates'), (990, 'stable-security'), (990, 'testing'), (990, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-19-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages profanity depends on: ii libc6 2.31-13+deb11u5 ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.74.0-1.3+deb11u3 ii libgcrypt20 1.8.7-6 ii libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 2.42.2+dfsg-1+deb11u1 ii libglib2.0-0 2.66.8-1 ii libgpgme11 1.14.0-1+b2 ii libgtk-3-0 3.24.24-4+deb11u2 ii libncursesw6 6.2+20201114-2 ii libnotify4 0.7.9-3 ii libotr5 4.1.1-4 ii libpython3.9 3.9.2-1 ii libreadline8 8.1-1 ii libsignal-protocol-c2.3.2 2.3.3-1 ii libsqlite3-0 3.34.1-3 ii libstrophe0 0.12.2-1~bpo11+1 ii libtinfo6 6.2+20201114-2 profanity recommends no packages. profanity suggests no packages. -- no debconf information