On 30/11/2022 07:29, Andreas Tille wrote:
3. Declare your package unsupported on 32-bit architectures and file a
removal bug with the ftpmasters.
For what architecture should we file a removal bug?
armel armhf i386 mipsel s390x
(390x is not 32-bit but is also affected, I missed that when initially filing
the bug).
The package was
never released on 32 bit architectures
ntcard was built on all release architectures and binaries for all
architetures are currently in testing.
After it was built, nthash was removed on 32-bit and big-endian architectures
as documented in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023060
Could you please give any reason which backs up your choice "serious"
for this bug report?
The rc policy says
Packages must autobuild without failure on all architectures on
which they are supported. Packages must be supported on as many
architectures as is reasonably possible. Packages are assumed to
be supported on all architectures for which they have previously
built successfully. Prior builds for unsupported architectures
must be removed from the archive (contact -release or ftpmaster
if this is the case).
Ref: RT?
Packages must be buildable within the same release.
Ref: RT?
