On Wednesday, 14 December 2022 10:07:49 AEDT Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 08:45 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > > I think this is an upstream bug for misusing an existing config file. > > While I agree on that... I'm not sure whether it's good to have two > separate config files for more or less the same thing. > This might open up all kinds of problems... e.g. administratively > (accidentally having the same mapping in both files) but also in terms > of support (will tools that parse crypttab suddenly support only one of > both?), etc.
I think having tools only parse one is a feature not a bug. Systemd does things differently and I think it would be good to be able to say "this is only for systemd". I've been trying to get the TPM support for Crypttab going, but so far it's only giving me warning messages from cryptsetup because it doesn't accept the parameters that systemd needs. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
