Hello, On Sat 17 Dec 2022 at 04:43PM +01, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: reopen -1 > > Hi! > > Sorry, probably my fault! As I tend to use «Fixes:» git pseudo-fields > for things that fix part of a bug, but are not intended yet to close it, > for which I use «Closes:». > > And for some reason I think I also got the impression, even though > the stanza changes had been committed, they could still be backed out. > (BTW I've now gone over the wiki and updated all paragraph references > that applied to stanza.) > > In any case, I've sat down and gone over the meat of the original > report. See below. We're sticking with 'stanza', and in light of that, could you confirm that the bug is reopened in order to make additional fixes, rather than back anything else out? Thanks. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
