Hi Shengjing, On 2 Jan 2023, at 6:44, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > Can't reproduce it on bullseye as well.
You are right: something is missing from the original report. Now I am unable to reproduce the problem on the same machine that first exhibited the problem. Either this is a case of user error on my part, or the problem only strikes when some other variable -- so far unknown -- is also present. I have reinstated our production experiment using the same config from before. I surveyed one machine by hand and it looked OK. Data from the others should trickle in over the coming days. If everything looks still looks OK, I suppose we'll just put this one down to PEBKAC. Will make a note to follow up here next week. Thank you!
