Amin Bandali writes: > Hello there, > > You might find it more convenient to depend on 'valgrind-if-available' > rather than 'valgrind' itself, per the attached patch. It also skips > tests that need valgrind, for problematic arches. What do you think?
To be fully clear, by "it" in "it also skips" I was referring to my attached patch, not the act of depending on valgrind-if-available.
