Package: buildd.debian.org Severity: important Hi,
I hadn't spotted that before because firmware packages moving from non-free to non-free-firmware needed a source+binary upload to go through NEW, with binary being `Architecture: all`… so I didn't spot that no autobuilding was happening until Salvatore started asking about firmware-nonfree builds that weren't happening (source-only for a newer release). I've let #-buildd know, but I'm filing this bug report for easier traceability. I had naïvely assumed that the same allowlist as non-free would make sense for non-free-firmware (since packages are getting moved from one to the other, I don't see what's changing for them), but maybe that warrants some discussion. In hinsight maybe we were talking about different things: bootstrap the n-f-f allowlist from the current n-f one, but keep them separate, vs. keeping a single common list for both. The former would look good to me. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
