El 1/2/23 a las 14:39, John Scott escribió:
Then again, I wonder if these timeouts reflect legitimate issues in the package? If you compile, say, abs-1.c by hand using an installed gcc-sh- elf assuming that's possible, and then try running it under sh-elf-run, does it appear to timeout?
I don't know, because I found about this by doing an archive-wide rebuild of all packages in bookworm (I didn't even go as far as actually using the package). My theory is that this is due to some behaviour change in gcc-12-source, the most important build-dependency, but I would still hope that such change could be disabled in the gcc-sh-elf package itself in some way. I've put all my build logs here for you to see: https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/gcc-sh-elf/ If you do tail -n1 * on them you will see that this was taking between one and two hours until 2022-07. Then something happened between 2022-07 and 2022-12 which made the build time to increase so much. The last three builds deserve an explanation: ==> gcc-sh-elf_4_amd64-20221211T112134.352Z <== Build needed 22:10:00, 3349844k disk space ==> gcc-sh-elf_4_amd64-20221211T112240.719Z <== Build needed 22:08:52, 3349900k disk space ==> gcc-sh-elf_4_amd64-20230121T070646.221Z <== Build needed 131:59:54, 4206644k disk space I killed the process by hand in the build logs of 2022-12-11 because I started to see there was something wrong (22 hours instead of 1-2 hours). That's why they appear as "failed builds". Then, on 2023-01-21, I decided not to kill the process to see how long would it really take. And it took 5 days. The build machines are diverse: yoda[12] and skywalker[12] are self-hosted virtual machines using kvm/libvirt, with one CPU and about 6 GB of RAM (enough for this package according to the data I collected by monitoring /proc/meminfo during the build). Machines with names starting with "hh" are Hetzner machines with 2 CPUs. Machines with names starting with a single "h" are Hetzner machines with a single CPU. I can provide ssh access to a Hetzner machine similar to the ones I used for you to test (please contact me privately for details). Thanks.
