On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 09:15, Tianon Gravi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 01:33, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Package: debuerreotype
> > Version: 0.15-1
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: patch  pending
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for debuerreotype (versioned as 0.15-1.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should
> > cancel it.
> >
> > cu
> > Adrian
>
> I'm sorry, but I must admit to being a little bit confused by this --
> why was this a whole new bug instead of just a comment on #1022854?
>
> (and why wasn't there any attempt to communicate about why it's urgent
> for you before the NMU, especially with such a short delay?  is there
> a particular reason you're doing this?  I can guess at your
> motivations, but it sure helps if they're written somewhere 😅)

Given the timezone differences, I've dcut cancel'd the upload for now
(assuming that gets picked up correctly and I didn't mess something
up).

I'm not opposed to the change (or even it being an NMU), but doing so
without a discussion doesn't seem right and I'd like to understand
what the end goal is better and why it's urgent enough for you to
upload with a DELAYED/1 NMU. 🙇

Thanks!

♥,
- Tianon
  4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36  4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4

Reply via email to