David Bremner <da...@tethera.net> writes: > Laurent Bigonville <bi...@debian.org> writes: > >> Source: darktable >> Version: 4.2.0-2 >> Severity: normal >> >> Hello, >> >> On x32 architecture, darktable FTBFS with the following error: >> >> 71 | #error "Unfortunately we only work on the 64-bit architectures >> amd64, ARMv8-A, PPC64 and riscv64." >> >> ATM, I see that ppc64 and riscv64 are not listed in the package >> architectures list. These should maybe be added. >> >> On the other side, x32 should maybe be removed >> > > So x32 is built because of "Arch: any-amd64"? That seems like a bug to > me, but what do I know.
So, I see that is really what dpkg-architecture thinks. If I understand correctly your proposal is to replace "any-amd64" with the list of things that are known to work? Sounds a bit tedious, but doable (eventually).