On 2023-02-21 09:45:34 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote: > >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes: > Michael> Excluding packages that only ship overrides/drop-ins, this > Michael> makes 37 affected packages in bookworm. > > If I'm understanding this issue correctly, the concern would be a > package that moved from /lib/systemd/system to /usr/lib/systemd/system. > Under the TC resolution, that should not be happening for bookworm. > > At least some of those packages are new services that have never been in > /lib/systemd/system. I believe for example pam is in that set. > > That's presumably not going to break something in the way that a file > moving between /lib and /usr/lib is. > But we don't want to encourage that movement. > > It seems like knowing how many incorrect moves we've had would also be > valuable--how many things that used to be in /lib/systemd but are now > appearing in /usr/lib.
None as far as I can tell. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
