Hi, On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 08:54:04AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2023-03-02 07:52:55 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > >> I have rejected the current package so we can re-use the version later > >> one, when this is fixed. > > > > Cofnirmed it was renamed in v4.4 upstream. I have put a comment on > > upstream issue about backports to older versions. > > Gah sorry about that, i should have done more extensive testing against > the version in stable. Thank you for the reject, that was the right > thing to do. > > i've already published the signed tag in git, so i'm inclined to *not* > reuse the version number, but instead move directly to +deb11u3 with the > fixed patch.
Personally, I did reject with the intention of reusing the version. But if you do not want to repush a fresh signed tag, then let's to so, please fix the patch on top of +deb11u2, as +deb11u3. In this case please build as well with -v4.3-1+deb11u1 so that we include both changelog entries, including the bugcloser. Does that work well enough for you? Regards, Salvatore
