Hi Steve, Ср 29 мар 2023 @ 00:49 Steve Langasek <steve.langa...@canonical.com>:
> Source: swi-prolog > Version: 9.0.4+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > > The swi-prolog core package ships a shared library, libswipl.so. The soname > of this library has changed between stable and testing, from libswipl.so.8 > to libswipl.so.9. > > While swi-prolog-core declares many "ABI" virtual packages, it doesn't > declare one saying what the soname is, which is the most standard way of > expressing dependencies in Debian packages. > > As a result, logol-bin in stable has dependencies on: > > swi-prolog-core (>= 8.4.2+dfsg), swi-prolog, swi-prolog-abi-binary-68 > > And these dependencies are satisfied by the swi-prolog-core in testing BUT > installing the swi-prolog-core from testing with the logol-bin from stable > is broken. > > This was correctly detected by the ci.debian.net infrastructure back in > December (though the logs from those runs have now been discarded). > https://ci.debian.net/packages/l/logol/testing/amd64/ > > swi-prolog should: > - make sure there is a real or virtual package libswipl9 > - make sure there is a shlibs or symbols file pointing to libswipl9, so that > packages which have an ELF dependency on this library also have that > expressed as a package dependency > - declare a Breaks: on logol-bin (<< 1.7.9+dfsg-6) so that older versions > which depend on a different SONAME aren't broken by partial upgrades. > > logol should then be rebuilt to pick up a dependency on libswipl9. Thanks for reporting! I've tagged this bug report with 'help'. I'm a bit overwhelmed at the moment and don't think I will have time for it or any other Debian stuff in the coming weeks. NMU is most welcome. Regards, Lev Lamberov
