On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 09:42:54 -0300 Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 08:28:28PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Hi Antonio, > > is there a better alternative SOAP client library for Ruby in Debian? [...] > I have no idea, I never worked on anything that needed to support SOAP, > except the occasional patch for apt-listbugs itself. savon looks more > active, having a release last December. But maybe just updating soap4r > based on that fork (which seems abandoned in 2018) is good enough? I > don't know.
Antonio, do you think it makes sense, if I reassign the bug report to ruby-soap4r? The circumstantial evidence collected during the investigation that you and Vincent have carried out seems to suggest that the issue is probably due to ruby-soap4r, although we do not have conclusive evidence... Having the bug report reassigned to ruby-soap4r may serve as a reminder to try to update the Debian package to a more active (or a less-long abandoned!) fork of soap4r. Not now, of course, but after bookworm has been released. Please let me know if you agree with this plan. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpXpbiv0Mtbh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
