Package: afl++ Version: 4.04c-3 Severity: wishlist Hello,
the AFL++ documentation recommends using afl-clang-lto(++) if possible[1]. Based on local tests, "PREFIX=/usr make" will produce an afl-clang-lto binary, if lld-14 is also installed (which should be the case, according to debian/rules). Not sure what's missing from the Debian package in order to get afl-clang-lto. Best regards, jn [1]: https://github.com/AFLplusplus/AFLplusplus/blob/stable/docs/fuzzing_in_depth.md#1-instrumenting-the-target -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.0 APT prefers testing-security APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-7-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages afl++ depends on: ii build-essential 12.9 ii clang 1:14.0-55.6 ii clang-14 1:14.0.6-12 ii libc6 2.36-8 ii libgcc-s1 12.2.0-14 ii libpython3.11 3.11.2-6 ii libstdc++6 12.2.0-14 ii procps 2:4.0.2-3 Versions of packages afl++ recommends: ii afl++-doc 4.04c-3 Versions of packages afl++ suggests: pn gnuplot <none> -- no debconf information
