Andreas Beckmann writes ("Bug#1035361: sauce: Potentially dangerous mode on
/etc/logrotate.d/sauce: 0755"):
> Package: sauce
> Version: 0.9.1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
...
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package's logrotate
> configuration causes logrotate to exit with an error after the package
> has been removed (*) or when logrote is run but no logfile exists.
Thanks for the report. I will fix this ASAP.
> Usually the solution is to specify 'missingok' in the logrotate
> configuration.
I will do some tests but that sounds like a possible approach.
> Setting severity to serious since this does not seem limited to being
> emitted after package removal but always. The current logrotate version
> in sid seems to be more strict.
I looked through the changelog and didn't find anything about missing
logfiles since at least 2015. Are you sure ?
> >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
>
> 0m17.0s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot',
> '/srv/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmp6h9n6ntx', '/usr/sbin/logrotate',
> '/etc/logrotate.d/sauce']
> 0m17.0s DUMP:
> warning: Potentially dangerous mode on /etc/logrotate.d/sauce: 0755
> 0m17.0s DEBUG: Command ok: ['chroot',
> '/srv/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmp6h9n6ntx', '/usr/sbin/logrotate',
> '/etc/logrotate.d/sauce']
> 0m17.0s ERROR: FAIL: Logrotate file /etc/logrotate.d/sauce exits with error
> or has output with package removed
I have one question. The message here is complaining about the file
permission. I think that mode is probably wrong, but I don't think it
is *dangerous*.
I don't think I ought to change the mode for bookworm.
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
