On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:08:52AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > ISC is not longer maintaing any of the components of isc-dhcp (client, > > I propose to mark it as unsupported. Or at least, limited, if we still > > have hope in those security update exceptions they claim they could do. [...] > It's not a service to our users to claim that we will not support them. [...] > But I'm afraid that we will have to keep maintaining those for the benefit > of our stable/oldstable (and even ELTS) users. I'm pretty sure that all > the other distributions will also continue to maintain those packages for > the lifetime of their respective releases so that we will have > opportunities to share the workload and patches.
Given what Raphael wrote, should this bug maybe be about marking isc-dhcp
unsupported in trixie?
If not, what else?
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
So what CAN we actually do? Well, individual decisions (eating less meat,
taking public transport, buying less fast fashion) are all important, but we
also need to change the system. As you may know, just 100 companies are
responsible for 71% of global emissions. (@JessicaTheLaw)
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/jul/10/100-fossil-fuel-companies-investors-responsible-71-global-emissions-cdp-study-climate-change
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
