Hi, Thanks everyone for the input ! Indeed the forking service type is the correct one for this package as daemon() is called as part of the initialization sequence. (if daemon() is not available, plain fork() is called anyway) I've adjusted debian/rules, taking into consideration Lorenzo's advice, thanks Lorenzo !
> Thanks! Do you know if you'd prefer to fork and file pull > requests/merge requests, or wait for the permissions to push directly to > be granted? I'd prefer waiting for push permission, for sure; if that is not possible in the near future, I can also fork and file requests. Have a great weekend! Alexandru ------- Original Message ------- On Saturday, June 3rd, 2023 at 1:58 AM, Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com> wrote: > Alexandru Mihail alexandru_mih...@protonmail.ch writes: > > > As for the old bugs, at least #491078 and #1018900 are stil present, I > > shall test a user submitted patch for the first one. > > > Thank you for taking the time to verify and document this. While not > required, it would also be nice if #491078 was noted in the appropriate > patch[es]. Bug-Debian is an optional field: > https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/ > > > I'll also create a salsa account soon. > > > Thanks! Do you know if you'd prefer to fork and file pull > requests/merge requests, or wait for the permissions to push directly to > be granted? > > > I hope this mail finds you well ! > > > Thanks, you as well! > Nicholas
